Hamburger SV: Trainer Tim Walter senses the pressure

A climate model is a representation of the physical, chemical and biological processes that affect the climate system. [3] Climate models use quantitative research methods to simulate the interactions of the terrestrial atmosphere, the oceans, the land relief and the ice . They are used for the study of the meteorological and climate system for future climate projections. Climate models are based on scientific disciplines such as fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, as well as physical processes such as radiation transfer, ie the incoming energy to the earth as the electromagnetic radiation of short wave (visible and ultraviolet light) and The long wave outgoing energy (infrared) from the electromagnetic radiation of the Earth. Models can be used to predict a range of variables such as local air movement, temperature, clouds and other atmospheric properties; the temperature, salinity and circulation of the ocean; the layer of ice on land and sea; the transfer of heat and humidity of the soil and the vegetation to the atmosphere; and chemical and biological processes, among others. The models related to the planet temperature predict an upward trend in the surface temperature and a rapid increase in temperature at high altitudes. The models do not presuppose that the climate will be heated due to the increase in greenhouse gas levels. Instead, the models predict how greenhouse gases will interact with the transfer of radiation and other physical processes. Cooling or heating is therefore a result, not an assumption, models. [4] Although researchers try to include as many processes as possible, the simplifications of the real climate system are inevitable due to the complexity of them, the restrictions of the available computational power and the limitations in the knowledge of the climate system. The results of the models can also vary due to different revenues of greenhouse gases and the climate sensitivity of the model. For example, the uncertainty of the 2007 projections of the IPCC is caused by (1) the use of multiple models [5] with different sensitivities at GHG concentrations, [6] (2) the use of different estimates of the Future human emissions of GHG, [5] and (3) Additional climate feedback emissions that were not considered in the models used by the IPCC to prepare its report, namely, the release of GHG from the permafrost. [7] The clouds and their effects are especially difficult to predict. Improving the representation of clouds in the models is therefore an important issue in current research. [8] Another important issue is to expand and improve carbon cycle representations. [9] [10] [11] Models can range from relatively simple to very complex: from simple calculations of radiative temperature that treat Earth as one more point, going through vertical expansions (radiative-convective models) or horizontal (energy balance models), to models Global climatics coupled atmosphere-ocean-Banquisa (sea ice). The models are also used to help investigate the causes of recent climate change by comparing the observed changes with those that models project from various natural and human causes. Although these models do not unequivocally attribute the heating that occurred from about 1910 to 1945 to the natural variation or action of the human being, it is indicated that heating since 1970 is dominated by greenhouse gas emissions produced by being human. [12] The physical realism of the models is tested by examining its ability to simulate contemporary or past climates. [13] Climate models produce a good correspondence with the observations of global temperature changes during the last century, but do not simulate all The aspects of the climate. [14] The climatic models used by the IPCC do not accurately predict the effects of global warming. The observed arctic thaw has been faster than predicted. [15] Precipitation increased proportionally to atmospheric humidity and therefore significantly faster than predicted by global climate models. [16] [17] From 1990, sea level has also increased considerably faster than predicted by the models. [18]

That the pressure increases in Hamburg, Tim Walter has registered very precisely in the past days. For Hamburg, says the coach, are obviously already felt defeats. A sentence that sounds from his perspective as if the public claims would not correspond to the possibilities of HSV. For truth determination, however, the other perspective serves - and from this, the HSV has not only felt, but factually disappointed twice aar. The cardinal problem is not public perception, it lies in the square.

The Last-Second point division at the bottom aue was flattering and threw up question marks, which after the country break in the renewed 1: 1 against Düsseldorf did not radiate, but rather greater, since despite the majority not only the victory, but also the control was made. Walter assures: We are not satisfied with the results.

I am convinced of the quality, only we have young players who need to develop their qualities only.

Tim Walter

In the next breath, the 45-year-old then always points to the goal of development. But where does the HSV develop? And whoever develops on? The offensive forces Manuel Wintzheimer and Bakery Jatta have been developing for weeks towards dead end; From the newlings, the loans Mikkel Kaufmann, Tommy Doyle, Miro Muheim and Mario Vuskovic play no role and other, as Ludovit rice only a supporting role. The throws two questions: Sets and appreciates the coach wrong? Or did Jonas Boldt, as a sports board in the overall responsibility, not sufficiently committed to quality? Walter explains: I am convinced of the quality, only we have young players who need to develop their qualities.

Nutrition for skeptics and critics

In the previous year, the HSV has not reached the goal because the pillar model of the bosses has failed crazing. Currently little indicates a progress after the columns were removed and replaced by Youngster. Nevertheless, Walter assures: Jonas, Michael Mutzel and I just sat together again and agree, we have the feeling that our way is perceived positively. A perception, who liked for the first weeks of the season, in which the will in the contemplation often got more weight than the wildness. In the latest two games but the latter increased overhand - coupled with the worst intermediate result in the 2nd league after ten games supplies the breeding ground for skeptics and critics. Incidentally not only in Hamburg.

Small speech can not be the meaning of the game

The trip to Paderborn (Friday, 6.30 pm, live! At Walter assures) is therefore becoming a guide. Again. There are names that the responsible persons in Hamburg are reluctant to hear from this early stage of a season, artificially small speeches, however, can not be the meaning. Because the East Westphalia with three points more than the HSV are exemplary for that too much less. In Hamburg, it ran in the past three years exactly the other way around. And the ongoing season does not deliver excessively indications that it could run differently in this.